demand the U.S. government only allowed to use Microsoft
By Victoria Esains
alt1040.comNovember 1, 2010 .
By Victoria Esains
alt1040.comNovember 1, 2010 .
Business Productivity Online Suite of
, the version in the cloud of products of the company, so from Google as " undue restriction of competition ", and apparently with good reason.
The document of claim relate a series of meetings between Google and representatives of IDPs who justify the restriction to Microsoft just because the other solution providers were not providing "unified and consolidated email and enhanced security." Of course Google did not remain impassive in the face of this, and went out to defend their solutions to this work, given the repeated denials of the DI, under the excuse that Google was not authorized to sell to the government ... lawsuit. The strange thing is the arguments about "security" when the first solution based on the cloud gain certification Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) U.S. government was just: Google Apps, as highlighted in ReadWriteWeb. As for providing unified email services, I think many will agree with me when I say that Google's mail service is by far the best on the market. In addition, Google Apps solutions have already used in some government agencies. But the important thing here is not which solution is best, but both should have equal , in a tender state about everything, and taking into account the charges of monopoly that both sides usually have. Will we see the Google-Microsoft battle off the tag and fighting in court? In reaching this instance, it will be something to analyze, and according to its outcome will set an important precedent no doubt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment